« A-10 Warthogs in Action Over Kandahar | Main | Obama Orders US Troops to March in Red Square »
March 27, 2010
Lawmakers: Navy and Marines Facing Larger Than Expected Fighter Jet Shortfall
Lawmakers: Navy and Marines facing larger than expected fighter jet shortfall
The Navy and Marine Corps face a much larger shortfall of fighter jets than expected, four senior members of the House Armed Services Committee warned Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
In a letter to Gates, the lawmakers said Pentagon assumptions of a shortfall of 100 fighter jets are “too optimistic.”
Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) signed the letter along with ranking Republican Rep. Buck McKeon (Calif.). Two other panel members with jurisdiction over Navy programs, Reps. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) and Todd Akin (R-Mo.), also signed the letter to Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The four lawmakers questioned the assumptions underlying the Pentagon’s calculations as well as its ability to fund efforts to tamp down the shortfall.
“We were concerned to learn that the shortfall of 100 aircraft, referenced in your testimony, is based on a number of optimistic assumptions and is only reached after several management efforts have been implemented,” the four lawmakers wrote to Gates in the March 12 letter. “Of great concern is the fact the shortfall number you mentioned is contingent on actions that are not included in either the FY 2011 budget request or the future years defense program.”
The shortfall of 100 jets comes from testimony Gates gave to the committee. He also said that number could go lower as a result of management efforts.
The lawmakers’ prodding comes as the Pentagon mulls whether to enter a new multiyear contract with Boeing for the F/A 18 E/F Super Hornets — the latest version of the carrier-based jets. Boeing has strong congressional backing for another multi-year contract.
The Pentagon is also experiencing trouble with the high-stakes F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program — the most expensive program to date and one that Gates is banking on.
The F-35 is facing significant cost overruns and schedule delays. The F-35 is supposed to replace the older versions of the F-18. Super Hornets, the newest version of the F-18, are supposed to share carrier deck space with the F-35 until 2030.
In order to manage the looming fighter jet shortfall, the Pentagon is eyeing efforts to extend the life of 150 older Hornets and reduce the number of aircraft in expeditionary squadrons.
In their letter to Gates, House lawmakers argue that the life extension of the Hornets, estimated at $3.5 billion, is not funded in the Pentagon’s budget, while the reduction of the aircraft in expeditionary squadrons cannot be done until the demand for these aircraft diminishes in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
“When combined these assumptions and unfunded levers mean that the true shortfall facing the Department of the Navy is likely to be significantly greater than 100 aircraft,” the lawmakers concluded. “The strike fighter capacity of our Navy and Marine Corps is a strategic asset that should not be allowed to wither.”
.
Wild Thing's comment........
Obama hates our military and he could care less how much power to fight the enemy our troops are given.
The Navy and Marine Corps face a much larger shortfall of fighter jets than expected, four senior members of the House Armed Services Committee warned Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
In cradle-to-grave welfare states, the military is not a priority - just look at Europe.
....Thank you Mark for sending this to me.
Mark
3rd Mar.Div. 1st Battalion 9th Marine Regiment
1/9 Marines aka The Walking Dead
VN 66-67
Posted by Wild Thing at March 27, 2010 06:50 AM
Comments
I still think they retired the F-14 too early.
Posted by: BobF at March 27, 2010 09:43 AM
I wonder how many other military items obama is going to cut. He thinks it is OK to fund ACORN(which has now broken down into numerous "community action groups") but not our defenses. I wonder how much has been quietly funneled to AmeriCorps to build up obama's civilian defense force.
Posted by: TomR at March 27, 2010 10:29 AM
We got a war going on and this MFer cutting munitions for the troops. The muslim rat bastard.
Posted by: Mark at March 27, 2010 11:58 AM
Grrrr....
Posted by: Jack at March 27, 2010 12:16 PM
BobF., I do too, I hate when they do things like that.
Posted by: Wild Thing at March 27, 2010 06:29 PM
Tom, exactly he spends freely on his ACORN and puts our troops in more danger with his many cut backs. It really burns me to think how our troops give their all and obama robs them of their tools to do things.
Posted by: Wild Thing at March 27, 2010 06:31 PM
Mark, DITTO that!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Wild Thing at March 27, 2010 06:32 PM
Jack yes a BIG GRRRRRRRRRRR
Posted by: Wild Thing at March 27, 2010 06:36 PM
It is a little worse that everyone is taking it. He provided funds for building two attack subs per year but he gutted stratigic defense. Whish is more likely a Q-ship loaded with missiles parked off our coast or a return to unrsstiked submarine warfare.
Posted by: Avitar at March 28, 2010 03:27 AM
