Theodore's World: Navy Being Downsized

« The Original Homeland Security Department | Main | Happy 232nd Birthday To Our US NAVY »

October 13, 2007

Navy Being Downsized




America’s Elegant Decline
The Atlantic.com

Hulls in the water could soon displace boots on the ground as the most important military catchphrase of our time. But our Navy is stretched thin. How we manage dwindling naval resources will go a long way toward determining our future standing in the world.

Beware pendulum swings. Before 9/11, not enough U.S. generals believed that the future of war was unconventional and tied to global anarchy. They insisted on having divisions to fight against, not ragtag groups of religious warriors who, as it turned out, fought better than state armies in the Muslim world ever did.

Now the Pentagon is consumed by a focus on urban warfare and counterinsurgency; inside military circles, the development of culturally adroit foreign-area officers (FAOs) and the learning of exotic languages have become the rage. My own warnings about anarchy (“The Coming Anarchy,” February 1994 Atlantic) and my concentration on FAOs and Army Special Forces in recent books may have helped this trend.

But have we pushed it too far? We may finally master the art of counterinsurgency just in time for it to recede in importance.

Today, while we remain fixated on street fighting in Baghdad, the militaries of China, India, South Korea, and Japan are modernizing, and Russia has maintained and subsidized its military research-and- development base by selling weapons to China and others. Though counterinsurgency will remain a core part of our military doctrine, the Pentagon does not have the luxury of planning for one military future; it must plan for several.



Wild Thing's comment........

This feels very weird to me. First it is our Navy's birthday and then I happened to see this article. It feels like a pat on the back and a slap in the face all at the same time.

The last thing that we should be doing is shrinking the size of any branch of our armed forces.

I think our war ships are awesome and I hate to see us getting rid of them. Our enemies will always be looking to hit us where we are weakest, relative to them.

"From time immemorial, the purpose of a navy has been to influence, and sometimes to decide, issues on land. This was so with the Greeks of antiquity; the Romans, who created a navy to defeat Carthage; the Spanish, whose armada tried and failed to conquer England; and most eminently, in the Atlantic and Pacific during two world wars. The sea has always given man inexpensive transport and ease of communication over long distances. The sea has supplied mobility, capability, and support throughout Western history, and those failing in the sea-power test – notably Alexander, Napoleon and Hitler – also failed the longevity one." ---First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Alan West


Posted by Wild Thing at October 13, 2007 12:47 AM


Comments

When I gaze at all the WW II US naval ships at the former Philadelphia US Naval Shipyard, I'm in awe how we kicked Nazi, Jap and Meatball ass
in three and a half years - from 1942 to 1945 - after Pearl Harbor was attacked on 12-7-41!
Now the panzies in the Pentagon won't let the dogs of war loose! So pathetic and disheartening.

Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at October 13, 2007 04:18 AM


"Don't give up the ship!"

Tradition has it that Captain James Lawrence said these heroic words after being mortally wounded in the engagement between his ship, the U.S. frigate Chesapeake, and HMS Shannon on 1 June 1813. As the wounded Lawrence was carried below, he ordered "Tell the men to fire faster! Don't give up the ship!"

Posted by: Steve at October 13, 2007 07:08 AM


The pendulum is always swinging in Defense funding. After the end of the Cold War and prior to Gulf War 1, we were on the fast track to downgrade heavy ground forces. Then we found a great need for quantities of heavy armor.

9/11 has shown us the need for light infantry and Special Forces, heavily backed up by high tech toys. As a former Special Forces trooper I say you can never have enough, but the quality must be maintained(years of training).

China is going Blue Water Navy and is spending our WalMart money building a huge military. We need to maintain our multi-ocean Navy to counter this potential rival. Right now I don't worry too much about Putin's boys as they are the Keystone Kops of major military forces.

America is way ahead in technology, if we can secure it and keep it from being stolen, or sold by Clintons. We have the best Air Force and strongest Navy. Our Army and Marines are unmatched, but too damned small. We should not be deploying the same troops to combat three or four times in five years. We need more manpower.

We also need honest Generals and Admirals who don't waste Defense dollars on unnecessary pet projects. And honest Defense contractors who don't underbid, then have cost overruns. And honest Congressmen(impossible) who don't waste Defense dollars on unneeded items just to receve kickbacks and votes from their districts.

Posted by: TomR at October 13, 2007 11:02 AM


Darth, that is neat, my Dad took me there when I was a kid.

Posted by: Wild Thing at October 13, 2007 11:38 PM


Steve love it, thank you.

Posted by: Wild Thing at October 13, 2007 11:39 PM


Tom, AMEN and a big ole ditto to what you said.

Posted by: Wild Thing at October 13, 2007 11:41 PM


... you're right for where have the Chesty's and Bull Halsey's gone... and Hap Arnolds? Too many REAR Admirals and Paper Lions / LIARS now in Alexandria. Bolshevik Up 2007!!!

Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at October 13, 2007 11:43 PM


May I suggest a new slogan for our military?

"Do NOT f*ck with us;
You WILL NOT win."

Simple, yet eloquent.

Rick, ATCS, USN, (Ret.)

Posted by: Rick at October 14, 2007 02:26 AM


I am presently active duty in the U.S. Navy and i am feeling the pinch from the budget cuts in manpower and purchasing power. They are taking away bodies left and right and not replacing them. We are doing more with less and then they are asking us to maintain our training readiness with little or not funds. How can we properly maintain these ships if we can't get the training to fix them. Never mind the fact that we don't have the money to fix them. I have been on ships that can't afford to order office supplies but get a complete overhaul of the galley or recieve 15 new plasma's for the mess decks and the officer's stateroom. But don't worry about it because it is all from a seperate pot of money. This article is right on, if we lose our sea presence what do we have? Land and air will not cut it. We have to dominate Land, Sea, and Air to keep the rest of the world in order. We set the standard accross the world, many of these contries don't like us, but they damn sure won't' mess with us. We downsize the navy, whats next? Army, Airforce, Marines. Less ships means less marines that we can transport at any given time. What happens to the Corps, they will be next to get downsized. This is the beginning of something nasty.

Posted by: Rc at October 18, 2007 02:06 PM