Theodore's World: Back in 2007 Obama Warned He’d Make the US Defenseless… Now He’s Cutting 80% of US Nukes

« Defense Sec. Panetta Calls on Congress to Oppose Obama's Automatic Defense Cuts | Main | Bill O'Reilly: If Obama Wins Reelection "You Will Not Recognize This Country in 4 Years" ~ This is so true!!!! »

February 16, 2012

Back in 2007 Obama Warned He’d Make the US Defenseless… Now He’s Cutting 80% of US Nukes

Barack Obama - Yes I Can Make Us Defenseless—Just Like Dec 7, 1941

Back in 2007 Obama Warned He’d Make the US Defenseless… Now He’s Cutting 80% of US Nukes

I’m the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it. Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems. And I will institute an independent “Defense Priorities Board” to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending. Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.”

Now he’s cutting 80% of the US nuclear arsenal.


There are some things happening today that are downright scary. The regime, led by Barack Hussein Obama, is weighing options for reducing our US nuclear force, including a reduction of up to 80% in the number of deployed warheads — 80%. Folks, this is staggering. Meanwhile, the Iranians are nuking up. Iran announced today that they’re gonna cut off oil to six countries that have opposed its nuclear program, and more importantly, Iran also announced that they have installed domestically made nuclear fuel rods in their Tehran reactor.

Now, if that’s true, this is significant because the sanctions that are currently imposed on them are supposed to prevent them from getting the material that you need to make nuclear rods. And, also, if this is true, it puts Iran that much closer to being able to make a nuclear weapon. We’re unilaterally disarming. We are not requiring the Russians to go along and, even if the Russians said they would match these reductions, they lie. That is the lesson of the Russians and nukes. What was our top moment? Our number of warheads peaked at 12,000 in the late eighties. And let me tell you something. That number of nuclear warheads is what helped us win the Cold War. That number of nuclear warheads sent a message to every other nation, particularly at that point in time, the Soviet Union, “You hit us, it doesn’t matter. We’ve got enough left to wipe you out in retaliation.” That many nuclear warheads was a deterrent.

So much is flashing back to me. You go back to the eighties and the seventies, the nuclear freeze movement, the peaceniks wanted to get rid of nukes, and there was an arms race going on. We were increasing our stockpile, as were the Russians. The numbers mattered only in terms of deterrent. We had to keep up, and we had to stay ahead. You build, for example, the B-2 bomber, hoping never to have to use it. The left has never understood this about military matters and defense. They never understood this about nukes. You build them so that you don’t have to use them. That’s the point. You don’t build them because you want to. You don’t build them because you can’t wait to use them. You don’t build them because you’re warmongers. You build them so that you don’t have to. It’s what’s behind practically every major weapon invention and manufacture.

The B-2 stealth bomber, you hope you never have to use it. Now, we have had to, obviously. But the hope is that the brute force and the ability to project power is enough to deter anybody from taking us on. It’s a great strategy, it is how this stuff works, and now Barack Obama is reducing our stockpile unilaterally by 80%, back to 300 warheads. Now, you might say, “Well, that’s good, Rush, it’s making the world safer.” It is not making the world safer. If the Russians still have 15,000 or 2,000, whatever the number is, folks, there’s a balance of power here that has shifted away from us, and this — I am here to tell you — is by design.


Wild Thing's comment........

This is putting the world on the path to WWIII.

Obama is not a fool. Obama is a radical left wing Marxist. If you look at each and every decision he has made it is totally and clearly rational if one is a Marxist.

Obama is scaling back America while passing technologies and money to the Islamic world. Empowering Islam.

Posted by Wild Thing at February 16, 2012 02:50 AM


The fact we had so many nukes spread out in such vast numbers made it impossible for the Soviets to target them all. They knew they could never win in a nuclear exchange.

While the Russians and Chinese are building their forces, Obama is decimating ours. I just read the New Strategic Guidance for USAF Force Structure Changes and it's scary what's coming down the pipe.

Posted by: BobF at February 16, 2012 07:26 AM

Scary. Nuclear proliferation is growing around the world, especially in unstable third world countries. We need all the military strength we can muster. We may need the capability of carrying on three or more wars at one time in scattered regions around the globe. obama wants to cut our nuclear deterrent, our R&D and our combat troops. Yes, he is a Marxist.

Posted by: TomR,armed in Texas at February 16, 2012 01:55 PM

Mr. Obama destroy the US nuclear arsenal, the US nuclear triad, and the US nuclear umbrella. (Mr. Obama is TREASON 24/7/365.)

Mr. Obama´s denuclearizing of the US nuclear arsenal is part of "THE COMMUNIST TAKEOVER PLAN," (section 8, and section 9), at .

Posted by: Anon at February 16, 2012 08:46 PM

Bob and Tom, thank you so much for your input about this.

Posted by: Wild Thing at February 17, 2012 03:24 AM