Theodore's World: Sarah Palin on Obama's SOTU Address: His Theme of "WTF" Was Spot On

« Hannity: Obama Gives Shout Outs to Two Commie Regimes in SOTU | Main | RINO Meghan McCain (desperate man’s last resort) : Bachmann a "Poor Man's Sarah Palin" »

January 27, 2011

Sarah Palin on Obama's SOTU Address: His Theme of "WTF" Was Spot On

"Win the future." That was President Obama's slogan for his State of the Union address, in which he used the phrase (or a variant) 11 times.

Sarah Palin on Obama's SOTU Address: His Theme of "WTF" Was Spot On

Sarah was in fire last night with Greta and she said that it was strange with Obama and his " win the future" theme last night in his State of the Union speech. She initial it on Greta as 'WTF' moments......She is goading the WH and the press on purpose---- love it! She said that the Spunik remark by the President was one of those 'WTF' moments!

She said that there were a " lot of WTF moments last night"

Wild Thing's comment.......

She came out swinging. Said Obama’s SOTU was “hard to stomach”.

LOL Sarah Palin is a smart woman. She knows when to be serious, when to be funny and has a great presentation. WTF! Good job, Girl!

Here are the TWO videos for her full appearance on Greta’s show: This is sooo good!

Part ONE

Part TWO

Posted by Wild Thing at January 27, 2011 05:55 AM


Sarah sure does represent my philosophy a hell of a lot more than most of the elected critters in DC. She also scares the poop out of a lot of those congress critters including, and maybe especially, the Rinos. She has a grasp on the real world and average Americans that is solely missing in our Federal govt. I like the way that Sarah avoids most of the PC language and gets to the meat of the matter. She is one of numerous Tea Party folk I have my eyes on as good candidates for 2012.

Posted by: TomR,armed in Texas at January 27, 2011 08:40 AM

I agree with you Tom.

Unfortunately, Sarah Palin has absolutely zero chance of winning any Election for National Office.

The MSM, which a large number of voters rely upon for their information, would create such a Toxic association with her name, that she would have absolutely no chance.

Her major role, in the upcoming election, should be the same one she had during the last one. That of advising and backing candidates that adhere to her philosophy.

If and when a Republican gets elected as President, it would be a very wise and prudent move to name her as Senior Advisor, or to some major Cabinet position.

Posted by: Sean at January 27, 2011 11:23 AM

When it comes right down to it the President is only one Man/Woman..We have 534 members of our
Legislature who tend to not listen to the electorate.. And the reason this takes place?? Simple as it get’s
we don’t hold them accountable. Come election time we vote, we go home and after the election we forget them till next election, in other words we are lazy and prefer someone else do it for us..Plain and
simple if there was say 85-90% turn out at the elections the silly bull $hit would stop..

If a elected official messes up remove them
By recall election and with more serious matters impeach the sob!!No official deserves more than 2 terms. None of the 30-40 year members whose pockets are full of pork…Want to control spending well
Start with foreign aid.. Clinton gave Pakistan a half a billion, we give Egypt a billion a year, pardon me but charity begins at home. One would think by now that Washington would have realized you can’t buy
Friendship..In this day and age I think it would be better in the long run to be feared than loved after
all what has all our trillions of money we have put out bought us but spit in our face and a stab in the back..The town where we live in Idaho has given its share of lives both in Iraq and Afghanistan and the
wheels are coming off in both countries.. Question, if 19 of the Hi-Jackers were Saudi then why did we
invade Afghanistan instead of the country where they came from and were supported by???

Posted by: gator at January 27, 2011 11:51 AM

gator - we didn't smash Saudi because they supply the West with too much oil. Saudi is the heart and soul of Wahhabism. We should have put a tac nuke on that silly damn cube at Mecca. Bush is too tied in with the Saudis to have attacked them. I believe the House of Saud needs to be destroyed. I wish we would get out of the Middle East, support Israel 100% and toss nukes at the trouble makers. Use our military to seal our borders.

Posted by: TomR,armed in Texas at January 27, 2011 01:37 PM

Yeah I know Tom, I was being a little sarcastic.. My neighbor was supervising the
Building of 450 Kv. Tower line into Kabul and was asked by an Indian engineer
that very question.. He also told me stories about Halliburton and KBR and how
they treated their employs..I’m with you Tom it’s time get the flock out of both

Posted by: gator at January 27, 2011 08:11 PM

You all are so wonderful, thank you for your comments.

Posted by: Wild Thing at January 28, 2011 03:48 AM