Theodore's World: Coast Guard Logs Show Administration Knew Extent of Oil Spill within 24 Hours

« Super Tuesday Primaries Some Good, Some BAD and Some....God Help Us! | Main | Marine: "Union bullying me to pay $500" »

June 09, 2010

Coast Guard Logs Show Administration Knew Extent of Oil Spill within 24 Hours




Coast Guard Logs Show Administration Knew Extent of Oil Spill within 24 Hours

by Connie Hair

Human Events

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), top Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released documents Thursday night showing the Coast Guard recorded on April 21 -- less than 24 hours after the Deepwater Horizon explosion -- the magnitude of the oil leak disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

“Potential environmental threat is 700,000 gallons of diesel on board the Deepwater Horizon and estimated potential of 8,000 barrels per day of crude oil, if the well were to completely blowout,” the Coast Guard reported in a log of events from the immediate aftermath of the April 20 explosion -- shedding new information on the first days of the disaster.


“These documents raise new questions about whether the White House was slow to respond to an incident that was quickly recognized by the Coast Guard as a potentially catastrophic threat to the environment,” Issa said upon release of the documents. “It appears as if this administration would rather tell a half-truth if the full-truth doesn’t fit the story they want to tell.”

Logs further indicate the Coast Guard recorded the immediate failure of the blowout preventer.

"Less than 48 hours after the explosion multiple attempts to activate the blowout preventer had already failed and the Coast Guard knew 8,000 barrels of crude oil spilling into Gulf waters each day was a real possibility," Issa added. "Americans have a right to be outraged by this spill, by top government officials caught off-guard, and by the facts the White House omitted in explaining what it knew and when it knew it."

Highlights from the logs:


• New Questions about Erroneous Oil Leak Estimates -- On April 21 the Coast Guard evaluated the “potential environmental threat” and concluded that in addition to 700,000 gallons of diesel from the vessel there was an “estimated potential of 8000 barrels per day of crude oil, if the well were to completely blowout.” This estimate, made one day after the explosion, was larger than both the initial 1000 barrels per day first estimate of oil lost and the first upward revision to 5000 barrels of oil leaking per day.

• Early Failed Attempts to Secure the Well -- While it has been reported that the first efforts to use remote operated vehicles (ROV) to activate the well’s blowout preventer occurred on April 25, Coast Guard logs indicate that efforts actually began on April 21. On April 22 logs state, “ROV attempts to shut-in the well were unsuccessful; a third attempt is being conducted.”
• The White House and “No Apparent Leak” -- The White House Oil Spill Timeline states that on April 23 there was “No Apparent Leak.” Coast Guard documents, however, reveal the full context of the claim. Coast Guard logs from April 23 state: “Earlier reports that the ROV had confirmed that that the blowout preventer valve was closed was incorrect. ROV has only been able to confirm there is no visible flow from the well.” Why wasn’t the oil visually evident? Coast Guard logs from April 22 point to the massive fire: “The majority of the oil continues to be mitigated by the fire … use of ROV to shut-in the well has been unsuccessful after several attempts.”

The Center for Public Integrity has constructed a complete timeline here.


Wild Thing's comment........

OMG! Obumbler knew how bad it was, and still did nothing for how many days????

Excellent work from our Coast Guard!!! God bless our Coast Guard!


And God bless Darrell Issa on top of this story too!

"Less than 48 hours after the explosion multiple attempts to activate the blowout preventer had already failed and the Coast Guard knew 8,000 barrels of crude oil spilling into Gulf waters each day was a real possibility," Issa added.

"Americans have a right to be outraged by this spill, by top government officials caught off-guard, and by the facts the White House omitted in explaining what it knew and when it knew it."

As for Obama, the oil spill fit his agenda to help destroy this country.


....Thank you Mark for sending this to me.


Mark
3rd Mar.Div. 1st Battalion 9th Marine Regiment
1/9 Marines aka The Walking Dead
VN 66-67


Posted by Wild Thing at June 9, 2010 06:48 AM


Comments

This is one more of the problems of drilling out so far from shore. It is much easier to cap something like this is say 150-200 feet than when your talking almost 5000 feet down. That is the encironmenttal whackos fault. But since that's a left handed group they will not own up to responsibility...And right now they are trying to afix blame to Bush. Unbelievable, they are responsible for nothing, it is always someone elses fault. They just happen to be there, If they fix it, of course, they also take all the credit. Again, though, the problem that caused it in the first place is never solved.

Posted by: Mark at June 9, 2010 09:23 AM


I agree Mark and the A$$HOLES in Washington buy into it. The tar balls should be collected and feathers added, tar, feather and run the whole bunch out of town.

Here’s another question. Obumble said he is not just sitting around talking to people like it’s a college conference, he is talking to the best minds so that he will know who to blame, who’s A$$ to kick. Who are these best minds, more academic riff raff like he surrounds himself with? Has he spoken to anyone at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Exxon/Mobil, Chevron, McDermott or others that may have expertise in offshore drilling and platforms? Nowhere have I heard that he has.

Posted by: Bob A at June 9, 2010 10:12 AM


http://www.rightofcenter.net/default.aspx?blogid=53

I just wanted to send this to you.

Posted by: Raven at June 9, 2010 11:50 AM


"Call for Obama´s resignation cites ´deceit, fraud, dishonesty´, ´We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government,´" June 08, 2010, at http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409 .

I agree in the remarks by MG (Ret.) Paul E. Vallely.

Posted by: Anon at June 10, 2010 01:46 AM


Mark, good point it sure would make a difference.


Bob A., good one!!


Ravem thatis great! Thank you soooo much!!!!!


Anon, I agree so much, thank you for the link and quote. He has GOT to be impeached!!!!

Posted by: Wild Thing at June 10, 2010 03:48 AM